CertAdvisorsm
(March
12,
2001)
Question
of the week
Follow
up to last week's CertAdvisor
Select
questions & answers
Share your cert-experience
How CertAdvisor
answers questions
Question
of the week
Q1) I
have passed my first A+ exam from tests covering the old 1998
objectives. Will I get certified if I choose and pass my second A+
exam from tests covering the new 2001 objectives? What are the major
features of 2001 exams? (From various members)
ANS) No, you will not
be certified.
In order to become A+ certified you must pass both exams covering the
1998 test objectives or both exams covering the 2001 objectives. You
will not become A+ certified if you pass one exam covering the 1998
test objectives and another exam covering the 2001 test objectives.
Though CompTIA retired A+ exams covering 1998 objectives on January
31, 2001, candidates have been given a ‘grace period’ through
March 30, 2001 to complete their certification on the older track.
The name of the exams has changed. The A+ Core Service Technician exam
is now called the A+ Core Hardware Exam (exam code 220-201) and the A+
DOS/Windows Service Technician exam is now called A+ Operating System
(OS) Technologies Exam (exam code 220-202).
The 2001 exams are based on an updated curriculum; in general there is
a new emphasis on networking and the 2001 exams are tougher to pass
than the 1998 exams.
The 2001 A+ exams have 70 questions each. There is a 90-minute time
limit to complete each exam.
The scale score for both exams is between 100-900. The minimum score
required to pass the A+ Core Hardware is 683. The minimum score
required to pass the A+ OS Technologies exam is 614.
For
now both the exams are offered only in the conventional (non-adaptive)
format.
For more information please visit:
http://www.comptia.org/certification/aplus/aplus_revision.htm
Follow up to last week’s Cert Advisor
Q2)
In last
week’s CertAdvisor you mentioned different options for a
candidate, who wished to continue certification training after
achieving MCSE. If such diverse options exist, why do so many MCSEs
choose to go for CCNA? (From Dana Williams)
ANS) In the absence of any research data on this issue, I can
only make a few educated guesses.
As compared to MCSE, CCIE, the premier Cisco certification, enjoys
greater prestige and offers better returns. CCIE
places a rigorous emphasis on practical experience and has a failure
rate of more than 85%. There are less than 5,500 CCIE professionals in
the world and each one of them earn in six figures. CCIE, thus,
becomes a tempting target for MCSEs who are more numerous, earn
relatively less and battle an industry perception that many of them
lack any hands-on experience or are just ‘Paper MCSEs‘. CCNA, an
entry-level Cisco certification, is a natural stepping-stone towards
CCIE in such a situation.
Further,
MCSE and Cisco certifications lead to different job functions. While a
typical MCSE professional is a server and LAN administrator, Cisco
certified professionals specialize in networking as it applies to the
Internet. As Internet shot into prominence in recent years, jobs
associated with it also grew in stature and are often perceived to be
more challenging and rewarding. Many MCSEs with an aptitude for
internetworking usually start their Cisco certification training with
the CCNA.
Select
questions & answers
Q3)
Is the Linux
Certified Administrator (LCA) certification still available from
ProsoftTraining.com? Which are the prominent Linux certifications
offered by companies other than Red Hat? (From Marvin Harris)
ANS) ProsoftTraining.com recently merged its Linux Certified
Administrator (LCA) certification program with the Linux Professional
Institute (LPI)'s certification program, LPI certification (LPIC).
ProsoftTraining.com said the ‘convergence’ was intended to
support the distribution-neutral, vendor-independent LPI program.
Existing LCA certification holders will receive automatic credit
towards the LPIC. LPIC, a
‘level-one’ certification, is for professionals who can install
and configure a workstation and perform easy maintenance tasks
understanding networking fundamentals.
LPI is currently developing levels two and three of its certification
program. Level 2 is targeted towards administrators who manage a small
mixed (MS, Linux) network or/and a small to medium-sized site.
Level 3 is for senior professionals who design and implement
solutions to complex automation problems, like multi-site enterprises,
heavy-duty Internet sites, custom solutions and so on.
LPI exams reflect objectives that have been culled through thorough
surveys of Linux system administrators for identifying relevant job
roles and required skills.
For more details about LPI programs please visit http://www.lpi.org/.
Another
noted Linux certification provider, Sair, offers three programs: Sair
Linux & GNU Certified Administrator (LCA), Sair Linux & GNU
Certified Engineer (LCE) and Master Sair Linux & GNU Certified
Engineer (MLCE).
Candidates
for these certification programs are tested at appropriate levels in
four usage areas: Linux Installation, Network Connectivity, System
Administration and Security, Ethics and Privacy.
SAIR certification programs cover professionals with varying levels of
knowledge -- from junior administrators to senior engineers.
For
more details about SAIR programs please visit http://www.linuxcertification.com.
CompTIA
recently launched another vendor-neutral certification, Linux+, to
measure fundamental Linux knowledge and skills of individuals with at
least 6 months of practical experience. For more details please visit:
http://www.comptia.com/certification/linuxplus/index.htm.
Q4)
I am
a Novell CNE and work as a Network Administrator. What are the waivers
available for Novell CNEs like me who want to pursue MCSE 2000
certification? (From R.
Venkatesh)
ANS) Microsoft
used to waive the networking exam requirement for MCSE and
MCSE+Internet candidates, who were already certified by Novell (CNEs,
Master CNEs, or CNIs), Banyan (CBSs or CBEs) or Sun (Sun Certified
Network Administrators for Solaris 2.5 or 2.6.)
But
this waiver was valid only for Windows NT 3.51 and Windows NT 4.0 MCSE
certification programs and is not applicable for the Windows 2000 MCSE
track. So, as of now,
your CNE status does not merit any waiver if you pursue MCSE 2000
certification.
Share
your cert-experience
This
week our member David McKay says he
does not find the retirement of MCSE NT 4 certification track
alarming.
“As
an instructor, I find that many candidates are needlessly apprehensive
or even depressed about the retiring of MCSE NT 4 certification track.
I beg to disagree with the common perception that NT
certification will become useless after they expire at the end of this
year.
The skills, candidates acquire in the process of achieving their
credential, are more important than the certifications they hold. As
long as they work to employ their skills in challenging assignments
and keep learning the emerging technologies, they should be able to
take all retirements in their stride. “
How
CertAdvisor answers questions?
a) CertAdvisor tries to provide expert counsel to all questions sent
to
it. But as a huge number of queries are submitted, CertAdvisor prefers
to
group similar questions and provide a combined answer for them. The
most
commonly asked question usually becomes CertAdvisor's Question of the
Week.
b) There is a possibility that your question has already been
answered.
So, before you send your question, may CertAdvisor request you to
check
questions that have been previously answered?
c) The expert counsel from CertAdvisor is intended to help you make
the
right decision. You are still urged to base your decisions on your own
research and assessment.
d) By submitting a question to CertAdvisor, you hereby grant
ExamsOnline.com the permission to post your question and our answers
online.
e) CertAdvisor also reserves the right to edit submissions made to
'Cert-experience' for readability and consistency.
f) To ask a question to CertAdvisor, you need to be an ExamsOnline.com
member. Please visit http://www.examsonline.com
to register for free.
Archives
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The fine print:
|